NEW KID ON THE MAINSTREAM BLOCK: WIKITRIBUNE (ARCHIVED)
It already seems that
Wikitribune will become a fierce opponent and since it is
so very young we actually have a chance to bury them much faster than
the rest of the lying press. For this reason I have created this
separate archived page for updates about Wikitribune.
Wikitribune Presents its "Reliable
and Ethical" News Sources List. Guess Who's (Not) On it...
For those who are still not familiar with Wikitribune, it is
Wikipedia's new propaganda venture that is about to take off any week
now. They have been postponing the actual launch of their very own
"evidence-based journalism" website a few times already because
apparently they are not sure which way to go with it (or are still
harvesting feedback through their corporate A.I.s that have to
determine how to best sabotage and hijack public outcries, because that
is the real world we are living in. Most of reality is now literally
simulated and artificially augmented).
That is not entirely my own personal opinion because when you look
at the ratings and feedback you immediately see that at least half of
its followers and even financial supporters are VERY skeptical about
everything that Wikitribune claims to stand for and wants to do.
Wikitribune is advertised as a community news website where users can
put forward their take on the news reports that the website puts out,
sort of the Wikipedia model but for "news" specifically. Last month I
wrote a first update about them and I pointed to the very valid
comments that were posted on their website, from users who smell that
something is fishy over there.
The same pattern continues. Wikitribune is indeed another carbon copy
of the political correct news websites that only present you what deep
state(s) want to have imposed on the general public. Wikitribune's
self-compiled "list of preferred news sources" attests to
Many of their followers and financial backers are NOT happy with that
list, and frankly I am shocked about this in a positive way.
I didn't expect that the trust in mainstream news producers was
actually this low among the general public because the news media and
their corporate owners have managed to keep the illusion of superiority
up, high. When you browse through the news, for instance at Google
news, all you find is mainstream press. No truly deeply rooted
alternative perspectives are getting through there, so in these ways
the corporate news media still have the upper hand. They have mastered
their trade of illusion to perfection over the past decades and it
shows. Even I am still often fooled by their slickness.
Clearly, though, more and more people DO hate the regular press and
only in mainstream comment sections that have not yet been closed down,
like at Wikitribune, can you measure that hate and skepticism. For how
long? I don't know but if (or when) Wikitribune continues like this
they too might just lock down their comment sections completely because
it is at this moment not doing them any favors. Unless they are just
deliberately generating data sets that their and other mainstream A.I.s
can tap into, which would have the sole purpose of further diverting
(hijacking) potent resistance.
As of this writing, Wikitribune's top 3 news sources that it
describes as and deems "reliable and ethical" are, in this order, Reuters, Associated Press and BBC. I kid you not, and the
comment section for their list pretty much sums it all up about how
people think about that. Like always of course the critical thinking
there too is deliberately water downed with text book comments of
The rest of the "reliable and ethical" Wikitribune list is, in this
order: New York Times, Washington Post, The Financial Times, Wall
Street Journal, The Economist, Axios, Quartz, BuzzFeed Investigations,
The New Yorker, The Guardian, Politico, Bloomberg and Nature.
I will post some of the good comments that were left at Wikitribune's
Downing: "I have issues
with the BBC. They appear very biased in the way they present the news.
Nothing that you can point to and say ‘that’s false’,
but the subtle innuendo. I saw a tweet, forwarded by WikiTribune, this
morning that said “Can we integrate reader communities into the
process of creating the news?” Here is the great myth of modern
journalism ‘CREATING the news’. Report it, explain it, yes,
but create it? No expletive deleted way! And that is my beef with the
Phil Spear: "I find it hard
to consider corporate news sources as reliable & ethical…"
Simon: "BBC News...
What a joke."
Vincent Godinich: "Just lost all
respect for this project when Buzzfeed was listed as a hard news
source. Buzzfeed. The 'news' outlet only famous for being trolled into
publishing a fake dossier of Trump that was so outlandish that it was
somehow as click-baity as it was partisan… a feat for Buzzfeed.
Just unsubscribed from the email list and lost complete interest in
following this project. It’s not 'evidence based
journalism'… it’s thinly veiled partisan hackery at best,
and grossly uninformed at worst. The search for impartial and open news
continues… wikitribune is just more of the same. Build your
house upon sand and all."
Súilleabháin: "The more I
read about this project the worse it gets. ... If you still think
it’s acceptable to use BBC as a trusted news source then you
should include other sources like Al Jazera and RT. At least that way
you will have different takes on each news story and the readers can
see what facts match up in each story. I was really hoping you would be
a positive change in the way the news is curated and reported. Sadly
it’s looking like more of the same."
Chris Gayler: "You cannot be
serious to include the NYT, WaPO, and AP in your list. If this
credulous nonsense continues, I will want nothing to do with this
project. May I suggest ConsortiumNews?"
say I’m stunned you not only rely on but mainly mention
mainstream corporate media as your preferred sources. ... I fear my
expectations are not met to say the least. Likewise I, at least not
yet, don’t see that I will proceed, supporting you…"
Still, it won't matter any bit what people think about Wikitribune
because it will just go along with what it is supposed to do. It will
find corporate backing anyway when too many individual sponsors quit
because Wikipedia has already become a major propaganda arm of the
controlled media, through which a deceiving and secretive deep state
control grid operates. Wikitribune is just another manifestation
of openly hijacking rebellion and the growing awareness among the
In stark contrast, websites like intelsector.com are truly the final
frontier of information warfare because it is there that the public is
presented with the tools and information to successfully undermine the
control grid that has been rolled out.
Without our kind of websites there wouldn't even be a resistance
anymore because most of the "alternative media" crowd has already been
diverted away from doing harm. All they do en masse is parroting the
mainstream narratives. We have seen this once more with the Las Vegas
shooting. All the mainstream talking points and "leads" are perceived
as being of great value. In reality, though, all these do is divert the
public (including most of the "truthers" and "conspiracy theorists")
away from finding out who
the real perpetrators are.
And with Wikitribune all you will get is more of the same. Deception
and false reporting.
(Note: I will create a separate archived page for Wikitribune because
it already seems that it will become a fierce opponent and since it is
so very young we actually have a chance to bury them much faster than
the rest of the lying press.)
FACT: New 4-Part ISIS (Docu)Drama "The State" is Zionist
Propaganda, Just Ask the Jewish Director
Peter Kosminsky is the creator of this propaganda campaign for Channel
(but in reality it is for Netanyahu his Irgun
titled The State. It tells the story of people joining ISIS (Islamic
It isn't Kosminsky's, who is a zionist jew
, first such propaganda
campaign. A few years ago he made another such "dramatized" 'factual'
piece called Britz
. He openly admitted then that "I know a lot of people will be very, very
angry. I've no doubt somebody will accuse me of making an al-Qa'ida
The Independent added "others will surely object to Muslims
being shown as extremists yet again."
Well yes, that's what this kind of propaganda is intended to do. To
polarize opposing groups and to radicalize muslims in the west so they
can keep the fires burning in the Middle East as unwitting proxies.
That's the whole idea behind the Irgun
Likud Party its
war on terror doctrine that the entire world seems to have copied
blindly (or under extreme pressure by (nuclear) blackmail at the hands
of the Israeli government).
From another perspective, I'm actually positively surprised that
critics and observers of the Wikitribune are paying attention. At least
Wikipediocracy: "Please ask
Mr. Kosminsky why he felt the need to “intersect” drama
with journalism. In other words, why was there a need to dramatize what
seems like could have been a perfectly engaging factual documentary?
And how is the viewer supposed to decipher what aspects of the story
adhere to authentic journalistic procedures, and which aspects have
been artificially enhanced for (presumably) ratings goals."
New "Wikitribune" Trashed by Own
what you can expect from the new mainstream
This is actually a great development and good news. Yesterday the first
Wikitribune article was published in an attempt to set the scene for
what is to become yet another mainstream rag that pushes the same old
biased political correct "news".
Wikitribune is the newspaper of Wikipedia.
They actually did such a good job at achieving their initial goal that
its own base trashed the very first article that was published.
You can read the poorly written article here
but the best part of it is the comments all
the way down the page. You should read them all because 75% of them are
saying that Wikitribune is totally biased and that their article is a
promo stunt for the UN and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. It
pleases me a lot actually to read this from their own base. Some are
even saying they're going to cancel their monthly subscription for
Wikitribune due to the lack of neutrality expressed in their